Recent news has shown that the Dutch police does use the location info
as evidence in court. According to this report (In Dutch) a man is believed to be the person who started a fire partly
based on the fact that his gsm pinpoints him in the location of the fire at
a time before the fire.
This is interesting from a legal standpoint since logs of location of a phone
are different from voice taps of a phone. Voice taps are made after permission
by the right authorities when there is sufficient reason to believe the person
is involved in a crime (at least that's the correct procedure).
This kind of information gathering happens after the possible criminal fact
has happened (so at the time of the gathering there was no permission to
trace the person). The information which is gathered is location data which is
fundamentally different from conversation logs.
Same things have happened in the US: a person was found (dead) using cellphone location records (washington post, simple registration required). This story shows that there are location records kept by the phone companies. (Source: comp.risks)
Requirements:
A report from the cell list:
11/10/00 10:32:02 AM 12592 3 unknown 11/10/00 10:32:28 AM 2613 3 unknown 11/10/00 10:32:34 AM 12592 3 unknown 11/10/00 10:32:46 AM 2613 3 unknown 11/10/00 10:32:58 AM - - lost service 11/10/00 10:33:02 AM 12592 3 unknown 11/10/00 10:33:16 AM - - lost service 11/10/00 10:33:32 AM 2613 3 unknown 11/10/00 10:33:36 AM 12592 3 unknown 11/10/00 10:33:50 AM - - lost service 11/10/00 10:34:02 AM 2613 3 unknown 11/10/00 10:34:08 AM 12592 3 unknownThat is 2 different cells (12592 and 2613). I don't have a map of which cell number maps to which physical location (maps welcome for libertel.. or any other dutch provider).
AT+CREG? +CREG: 0,1,"0003","6F05"Area 0x0003, Cell number 0x6F05. Repeat until bored :)
AT+CSQ +CSQ: 13,9913 = signal level, 99 = bit error rate unknown.
The readings vary a lot. Which makes me wonder how feasible the 'using gsm for determining location' idea is. But the fact that the phone lies on top of a metal desk when it's connected to the computer might influence readings.
And something probably got fixed at Libertel since I now have a very constant cell number (12592) at home. Or maybe I should swap simms to see if prepay sims have lesser quality network then subscription sims.
The Nokia is willing to show cell numbers, given an initialization command. After which it will also report when the cell number changes:
AT+CREG=2 OK AT+CREG? +CREG: 2,1,"0021","6E0B" OK +CREG: 1,"0021","6E0C" +CREG: 1,"0021","6E0B" AT+CSQ +CSQ: 17,99And I can ask nicely for the network list.. and wait a bit for the answer
AT+COPS? +COPS: 0,2,"20404" OK AT+COPS=? +COPS: (1,"vodafone NL",,"20404"),(3,"O2 - NL",,"20412"), (3,"NL KPN",,"20408"),(3,"Orange NL",,"20420"), (3,"T-Mobile NL",,"20416"),,(0,1),(2) OKThe codes (like 20404) are from the networks, but the descriptions are just what the phone remembers, so that's why it shows the already old name for "O2".